LineStar Review
Based on online research and 7 LineStar reviews, LineStar's overall score is 3.9 out of 5 stars. LineStar's review score is based on LineStar's customer ratings, its brand popularity, its price competitiveness, as well as the breadth and quality of features it offers to customers. The LineStar review table below incorporates summarizes 7 LineStar ratings. You can also compare LineStar against popular alternatives like FanDuel, PrizePicks and Sleeper. Or you can view the top 50 brands in similar categories, such as entertainment services, gambling and fantasy sport stores.
Brand popularity
Shipping & returns policies
Coupons & discounts
Customer-specific discounts
Company values, ethics & policies
Customer service & brand
Privacy policy & data security
Loyalty, rewards & partnership programs
Seasonal sales & events
LineStar Review: LineStar Pros & Cons
LineStar (linestarapp.com) is a well-known fantasy sport store which competes against other fantasy sport stores like FanDuel, PrizePicks, Sleeper, Underdog Fantasy and RotoWire. Based on our in-depth LineStar review, when compared to its competitors, LineStar is a mid-range performing brand within its category. Read the full Linestarapp.com review below for more details.
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
Knoji has 7 LineStar reviews and ratings as of June 19, 2026. Knoji editors and the Knoji shopper community have reviewed LineStar and compared it against 125 top fantasy sports brands, reviewing LineStar based on product and store features. Knoji reviews and ranks Linestarapp.com and other fantasy sport stores based on how many features each offers and based on a 5-star rating scale. Based on these factors and 7 LineStar reviews, LineStar earns an overall score of 3.9 out of 5.0 points. LineStar's review score also factors in its popularity, which is in the mid-range compared to competing .
